| Original language | English |
|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 146-163 |
|---|
| Journal | Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews |
|---|
| Volume | 90 |
|---|
| Early online date | 12 Apr 2018 |
|---|
| DOIs | |
|---|
| Accepted/In press | 9 Apr 2018 |
|---|
| E-pub ahead of print | 12 Apr 2018 |
|---|
| Published | Jul 2018 |
|---|
| Additional links | |
|---|
Differences in the Theory_LEPPANEN_Accepted9April2018_GREEN AAM (CC BY-NC-ND)
Differences_in_the_Theory_LEPPANEN_Accepted9April2018_GREEN_AAM_CC_BY_NC_ND_.pdf, 1.08 MB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:13 Apr 2018
Version:Accepted author manuscript
Licence:CC BY-NC-ND
© <2018> This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
Background: This meta-analytic review examines the theory of mind
profiles in both patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and autistic
individuals.
Methodology: The studies examining theory of mind were divided into the
following categories: emotional theory of mind, understanding simple
social situations, understanding complex social interactions, and implicit
social attribution. All included studies investigated differences between
healthy control (HCs) individuals and people with AN or autistic people.
Differences in theory of mind profile between people with AN and autistic
people were explored by conducting moderator analyses.
Results: People with AN and autistic people showed a similar theory of
mind profile, but autistic individuals showed greater difficulties,
particularly in emotional theory of mind.
Conclusions: Although both people with AN and autistic people have
significant difficulties in all aspects of theory of mind relative to the HCs,
some differences in the underlying profile may be present. However, due
to relative paucity of theory of mind research among people with AN,
further research is still needed before firm conclusion can be drawn.